15th - 20th September 2009
Riva del Garda | Trento, Italy
Contact us
Conference Secretariat
Via R. Guardini 8 - 38100 Trento Italy
T +39 0461 824326 - F +39 0461 824251
info@eaaitaly2009.com
Scientific Secretariat
scientific_s@eaaitaly2009.com
Conference Secretariat
Via R. Guardini 8 - 38100 Trento Italy
T +39 0461 824326 - F +39 0461 824251
info@eaaitaly2009.com
Scientific Secretariat
scientific_s@eaaitaly2009.com
You are in: Home
> Call for papers > Posters
> GIS methodological approaches to the study of spatial behavior.
There has been a long-standing debate in academic archaeology on how to study the surface archaeological record. The debate has centered around whether to interpret the record as consisting of discrete sites and isolates or as continuous distributions of artifacts, features, and deposits. Historic preservation laws, however, focus on discrete sites as the properties that need to be discovered, recorded, and evaluated. As more research is done within a ! heritage management framework, the outcome has been to focus on the site as the unit of analysis almost to the exclusion of the study of spatial behaviors that transcend discrete sites. To achieve the objectives of heritage preservation and to examine spatial human behavior that is unconstrained by the site concept, new methodologies are needed. As a move in this direction we use GIS to create hypothetical archaeological landscapes based on assumptions of human behavior that can be tested and refined with survey and excavation data. In this process we collect detailed surface data that GIS algorithms use to define discrete sites and, at the same time, to analyze continuous distributions of cultural materials. We illustrate this approach with a several examples from North America and West Africa using different field methodologies.
e-mail: rct@sricrm.com
GIS METHODOLOGICAL APPROACHES TO THE STUDY OF SPATIAL BEHAVIOR.
Richard Ciolek-Torrello - co-organisers: Michael Heilen, William Hayden, Jeffrey H. Altschul and GerThere has been a long-standing debate in academic archaeology on how to study the surface archaeological record. The debate has centered around whether to interpret the record as consisting of discrete sites and isolates or as continuous distributions of artifacts, features, and deposits. Historic preservation laws, however, focus on discrete sites as the properties that need to be discovered, recorded, and evaluated. As more research is done within a ! heritage management framework, the outcome has been to focus on the site as the unit of analysis almost to the exclusion of the study of spatial behaviors that transcend discrete sites. To achieve the objectives of heritage preservation and to examine spatial human behavior that is unconstrained by the site concept, new methodologies are needed. As a move in this direction we use GIS to create hypothetical archaeological landscapes based on assumptions of human behavior that can be tested and refined with survey and excavation data. In this process we collect detailed surface data that GIS algorithms use to define discrete sites and, at the same time, to analyze continuous distributions of cultural materials. We illustrate this approach with a several examples from North America and West Africa using different field methodologies.
e-mail: rct@sricrm.com
